Abstract SY05-01: Genetic and non-genetic mechanisms contribute to long-term clonal growth dynamics and therapy resistance.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Individual cells of a tumor vary in many hallmarks of cancer and this heterogeneity can contribute to therapy failure and disease recurrence. The cellular and molecular basis for intra-tumoral heterogeneity is poorly understood. Individual tumor cells can exhibit genetic diversity due to mutations and clonal evolution resulting in intra-tumoral functional heterogeneity. Thus, a single tumor can be composed of genetically distinct subclones, each with distinct functional properties. However, non-genetic determinants also can drive heterogeneity. Often proposed as mutually exclusive to genetic models, the cancer stem cell (CSC) model postulates that tumors are cellular hierarchies, where subpopulations of self-renewing cancer stem cells (CSC) sustain long-term clonal maintenance (i.e. long term tumor propagation only derives from CSC). CSC and non-CSC are considered to be genetically identical (although evidence is very limited), therefore developmental pathways and epigenetic modifications govern the stemness state and drive this functional heterogeneity. There is strong evidence for the CSC model in AML and some solid tumors. By fractionating primary AML into functionally defined leukemia stem cells (LSC) and non-LSC populations and subjecting these to mRNA and miRNA profiling, we have identified an LSC specific gene signature. The LSC signature is highly similar to normal HSC-specific signatures revealing a common and shared stemness program that governs the stem cell state. Critically, the LSC signature and the common stemness signature were shown to be strong independent predictors of patient survival in large clinical databases; bulk blasts and non-LSC fractions lacked prognostic power (Eppert Nature Med 2011). Thus, determinants of stemness influence clinical outcome of AML establishing the clinical relevance of LSC are and not artifacts of xenotransplantation. This work and other recent reports of stem cell prognostic power establishes clinical relevance and helps to place the entire CSC concept onto a stronger footing. In an effort to determine if the clonal evolution genetic model and the CSC model of cancer can be unified, we have carried out three different studies examining CSC from both the functional and the genetic level. To conclusively establish that human acute leukemia possess functionally distinct genetic subclones we focused on Ph+ B-ALL. Genome sequencing is clearly showing that genetic diversity exists in leukemia and solid tumors, however an in silico demonstration of diversity cannot establish how the cellular properties of the tumor cells are influenced by specific gene abnormalities. We found that diagnostic patient samples possessed extensive subclonal genetic diversity and through the use of xenotransplant assays, we found that this diversity originated from within the leukemia initiating cells (L-IC). Individual mice derived from the same primary sample were repopulated with genetically distinct subclones and the growth properties, L-IC frequency, etc were distinct for each subclone. Reconstruction of their genetic ancestry showed that multiple L-IC subclones were related through a complex branching evolutionary process indicating that genetic and functional heterogeneity are closely connected (Notta Nature 2011). Direct clonal evidence that an individual L-IC can evolve came from our prior study of human B-ALL initiated in an experimental leukemogenesis model where human progenitors were transformed with an MLL-ENL vector (Barabe Science 2007). Serial xenografts of B-ALL showed evolution at the Ig locus, yet the viral insertion confirmed the disease was initiated with a single L-IC. Thus the evolution and CSC models need not be mutually exclusive: CSC are not static and they are subject to acquisition of new mutations and subsequent evolution during disease progression. New additional evidence on changes in LSC during disease progression will be presented where we have examined the genetic diversity of paired diagnostic and relapse sample of AML, combined with parallel xenografting and LSC studies. Collectively our study points to the need to develop effective therapies to eradicate all genetic subclones to prevent further evolution and recurrence. Our third functional/genetic study involved colorectal cancer (CRC) and directly tested functional repopulation behaviour of single cells. In parallel the genetic diversity of the single clones that propagated in xenogafts was also ascertained enabling an evaluation of the relative contribution of genetic and non-genetic determinants to variable growth properties. Our lab developed a highly reliable xenograft assay for primary CRC. By combining DNA copy number alteration (CNA) profiling, targeted and exome sequencing and lentiviral lineage tracing, we followed the repopulation dynamics of many single lentivirus-marked lineages from colorectal cancers through serial xenograft passages. The xenografts were genetically stable on serial transplantation. Despite this genetic stability, the proliferation, persistence, and chemotherapy tolerance of lentivirally marked lineages was variable within each clone. Not all tumor-initiating cells (T-IC) cells are contributing to tumor growth continuously: some are held in reserve, while others have the ability to oscillate between periods of dormancy and activity. This distinct intraclonal behavior affected response to conventional chemotherapy, as actively proliferating progeny were preferentially eliminated, while the relatively dormant CRC cells became dominant during tumor re-initiation following chemotherapy. The intraclonal diversity in genetically identical, single cell functional behavior of primary human CRC cells in vivo has the net effect of contributing to tumor growth during both homeostasis and therapy response (Kreso Science 2013). Our findings reveal another layer of complexity, beyond genetic diversity, that drives intratumoral heterogeneity of CRC. The prospect of understanding how genetic and non-genetic determinants interact to influence the functional diversity and therapy response for other cancers should drive future cancer research. Citation Format: John E. Dick. Genetic and non-genetic mechanisms contribute to long-term clonal growth dynamics and therapy resistance. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr SY05-01. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-SY05-01
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".