MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3140737824 · doi:10.18050/revpsi.v21i1.2671

Evaluación y rehabilitación de la capacidad comunicativa en una paciente con Afasia de Broca

2020· article· es· W3140737824 on OpenAlex
César A. Peña Caballero

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Psicología (Trujillo) · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyStroop effectCognitionPhilosophyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Se realizó una evaluación y rehabilitación de la capacidad comunicativa de una paciente de 75 años de edad con afasia de Broca, en la ciudad de Trujillo, Perú, con una paciente quien sufrió accidente cerebrovascular. En la evaluación neuropsicológica, se realizó un análisis clínico cualitativo y aplicación de las pruebas Stroop, INECO Frontal, Mini Mental, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Batería Neuropsi, Copia de una figura compleja y Test de percepción de diferencias; posteriormente, se ejecutó un programa de rehabilitación -entre agosto y noviembre de 2017- con el objetivo de favorecer el logro de conductas comunicativas para que la evaluada realice sus actividades diarias con autonomía. En conclusión, se mejoró levemente la capacidad comunicativa de la paciente y, debido a ello, su autonomía.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it