MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3141213720

An epidemiological study of collagenous colitis in southern Sweden from 2001-2010

2012· article· en· W3141213720 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue世界胃肠病学杂志:英文版 · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMicroscopic Colitis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyEpidemiologyColonoscopyColorectal cancerCancer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

瞄准:在 2001-2010 期间在南部的瑞典估计成胶的大肠炎(CC ) 的发生。方法:盒子被在 Sk 的县在病理部门在诊断寄存器寻找 CC 识别 ? ne。集水区域包括了县(在 2010 的 394307 个居民) 的西南部分并且一与有限移植混合了城市、农村的类型。在定义时期期间经历了 colonoscopy 并且正在住在这个区域的 CC 病人不管在哪儿在学习被包括在 Sk ? ne 他们被诊断了。医药记录被细看,不明确的盒子被重估保证仅仅最新诊断的 CC 盒子被包括。CC 的诊断基于临床、组织病理学说的标准。临床的标准是非流血的水的腹泻。组织病理学说的标准是一长期煽动性在薄板 propria 渗透,变厚的 subepithelial 骨胶原层 10 测微计(m) 和上皮的损坏象变平和分队那样。结果:在从 2001-2010 的十个年时期期间,在西南的 198 个 CC 病人 Sk 的县分开 ? 在南部的瑞典的 ne 最新被诊断。这些, 146 是女人, 52 是男人,即,女性:2.8:1 的男比率。在诊断的中部的年龄是 71 年(范围 28-95/inter-quartile 范围 59-81 ) ;为女人,中部的年龄是 71 (范围 28-95 ) 年并且是 73 (范围 48-92 ) 为男人的年。吝啬的年度发生是 5.4/105 居民。在时间经期 2001-2005 和 2006-2010 期间,吝啬的年度发生率是为两个时期的 5.4/105 [95% 信心间隔(CI ) :在 2001-2005 的 4.3-6.5 和在 2006-2010 的 4.4-6.4,分别地并且为整个经期的 4.7-6.2 ] 。尽管发生多年以来变化了,(到最大的 6.7/105 的最小 3.7 ) 发生的增加或减少都不能被识别。机会比率(或) 因为在与男人相比的女人的 CC 被估计是 2.8 (95% CI:2.0-3.7 ) 。为女人的 OR 65 岁以上与相比低于 65 岁是 6.9 (95% CI:5.0-9.7 ) ,并且为女人 65 岁与整个组相比的以上 OR 是 4.7 (95% CI:3.6-6.0 ) 。OR 好久一般来说,即,在上面或与比 65 年轻的那些相比的 65 岁是 8.3 (95% CI:6.2-11.1 ) 。也从 Calgary 在为 CC 的最后

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it