A Recurrent Case of Targetoid Hemosiderotic Hemangioma: A Case Report and a Comprehensive Review of the Literature.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Targetoid hemosiderotic hemangioma is an acquired vascular malformation of unknown origin. We report the case of a 31-year-old man with a recurrent and spontaneous regressive targetoid hemosiderotic hemangioma. Diagnosis relied on clinical and histological findings. Physical examination revealed presence of an approximately 2 cm targetoid lesion located on the left arm, and associated with pain after pressure. No trigger agent (trauma, insect sting) was reported. Dermoscopy showed a group of red lacunae centrally, encircled by an intermediate yellow circular homogenous area and a red violaceous homogenous ring in the periphery. The histopathological examination and the immunohistochemical staining of the lesion were characteristic for a hemangioma-like proliferation of vessels in the upper part of the dermis, similar to a targetoid hemosiderotic angioma. We also review epidemiological, clinical, and histopathological findings in 6 similar cases presented in the literature. Spontaneous regression and recurrence have rarely been described in this type of skin lesion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".