Normative values of trunk flexors and extensors muscles endurance of healthy college students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Objective of this study was to establish normative reference values of trunk flexors and extensors muscle endurance of healthy college students. Method: A cross sectional study was carried out with 500 subjects aged between 18 to 25 years. Evaluation of muscle strength and endurance was done with the use of Canadian Standardized Test of Fitness which includes four static and two dynamic muscles performance. Result: In this study we establish normative data for male and female both. The mean value for different tests are 60 sec (for male) and 25 sec (for female) for IUA, 21 sec (for male) and 9 sec (for female) for ILA, 36 rep (for male) and 14 rep (for female) for DUA, 29 sec (for male) and 17 sec (for female) for IUBE, 50 sec (for male) and 34 sec (for female) for ILBE, 16 rep (for male) and 9 rep (for female) for DUBE. Conclusion: The gender reference norms for static and dynamic endurance of trunk flexors and extensors group of muscles established in this study which could be used as outcome measure for improvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".