MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142341578 · doi:10.31207/colloquia.v6i0.77

El sonido y el verbo

2019· article· es· W3142341578 on OpenAlexaff
Jorge Campos

Bibliographic record

VenueColloquia Academic Journal of Culture and Thought · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComparative Literary Analysis and Criticism
Canadian institutionsAS Composite (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desde siempre, el diálogo entre las artes nos ha revelado una suerte de nostalgia recíproca, una especie de deseo obstinado de encontrarse. De estas tentativas quedan vestigios de tensiones y rupturas. Sin embargo, hemos asistido a momentos de una fuerte condensación de energías diferentes, que han dado lugar a fenómenos muy singulares, llegando hasta revolucionar las trayectorias de las artes.
 Esta pasión primordial revela la necesidad de traspasar las fronteras creadas por los geodésicos de las artes para hacer converger las vibraciones poéticas y sonoras, dando lugar a creaciones completamente inéditas, que disimulan ya sea una paralelismo, una analogía o incluso una negación de sus correspondientes.
 El título del presente artículo nos remite al fenómeno que acabamos de evocar.
 Se intentará retrasar los avatares del poema sinfónico para llegar al poema electrónico, con el objetivo de establecer un estado de lugar, de las relaciones entre la música y la poesía, utilizando como ejes de este periplo Mazeppa ( poema de Víctor Hugo, poema sinfónico de Franz Liszt), La noche transfigurada ( poema de Richard Dehmel, poema sinfónico de Arnold Schoemberg), Don Quijote ( poema sinfónico de Richard Strauss basado sobre el personaje de Cervantes).
 Abordaremos una de las más recientes relaciones de este tipo, analizando el resultado de la trinidad fecunda entre el arquitecto Le Corbusier, asistido por los compositores Iannis Xenakis y Edgar Varèse con su poema electrónico.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueColloquia Academic Journal of Culture and ThoughtSame topicComparative Literary Analysis and CriticismFrench-language works237,207