Taniajacoite and Strontioruizite, Two New Minerals Isostructural with Ruizite from the N'Chwaning III Mine, Kalahari Manganese Field, South Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Two new mineral species, taniajacoite and strontioruizite, ideally SrCaMn3+2Si4O11(OH)4·2H2O and Sr2Mn3+2Si4O11(OH)4·2H2O, respectively, have been identified from the N'Chwaning III mine, Kalahari manganese field, South Africa. Both minerals occur as brown radiating groups or aggregates of acicular or prismatic crystals, with individual crystals up to 0.15 × 0.04 × 0.02 mm for taniajacoite and 1.3 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm for strontioruizite. Minerals associated with taniajacoite include sugilite, aegirine, pectolite, richterite, potassic-ferri-leakeite, and lipuite, whereas those associated with strontioruizite include sugilite, potassic-magnesio-arfvedsonite, and lipuite. Both taniajacoite and strontioruizite are brown in transmitted light, transparent with very light brown streak and vitreous luster. They are brittle and have a Mohs hardness of 5–5.5; cleavage is good on {010} and no parting or twinning is observed macroscopically. The measured and calculated densities are 3.05(2) and 3.09 g/cm3, respectively, for taniajacoite and 3.20(2) and 3.16 g/cm3 for strontioruizite. Optically, both taniajacoite and strontioruizite are biaxial (–), with α = 1.686(2), β = 1.729(2), γ = 1.746(2) (white light), 2V (meas.) = 63.7(5)°, 2V (calc.) = 62.5° for the former and α = 1.692(2), β = 1.734(2), γ = 1.747(2) (white light), 2V (meas.) = 59.1(5)°, 2V (calc.) = 56.6° for the latter. The calculated compatibility index based on the empirical formula is 0.008 for taniajacoite and 0.015 for strontioruizite. An electron microprobe analysis yielded an empirical formula (based on 17 O apfu) of Sr(Ca0.81Sr0.19)Σ1.00(Mn3+1.90Fe3+0.15Al0.01)Σ2.06Si3.96O11(OH)4·2H2O for taniajacoite and (Sr1.61Ca0.42)Σ2.03(Mn3+1.95Fe3+0.05)Σ2.00Si3.98O11(OH)4·2H2O for strontioruizite. Taniajacoite and strontioruizite are isostructural with ruizite. Strontioruizite, like ruizite, is monoclinic with space group C2 and unit-cell parameters a = 9.1575(4), b = 6.2857(4), c = 12.0431(6) Å, β = 91.744(4)°, and V = 692.90(6) Å3, whereas taniajacoite is triclinic, with space group C1 and a = 9.1386(5), b = 6.2566(3), c = 12.0043(6) Å, α = 90.019(4), β = 91.643(4), γ = 89.900(4)°, and V = 686.08(6) Å3. Their structures are characterized by chains of edge-sharing MnO6 octahedra extended along [010], which are linked together by corner-shared SiO4 tetrahedra in four-membered [Si4O11(OH)2] linear clusters, giving rise to a so-called “hetero-polyhedral framework”. The large cations Sr2+ and Ca2+ occupy the seven-coordinated interstices. Unlike monoclinic ruizite and strontioruizite, taniajacoite with Sr:Ca ≈ 1:1 is triclinic, owing to the ordering of Sr2+ and Ca2+ into two crystallographically distinct sites, indicating an incomplete solid solution between Ca and Sr endmembers. The unit-cell volumes for ruizite, taniajacoite, and strontioruizite appear to vary linearly with the Sr/(Ca + Sr) ratio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".