The Utilization of Durian Seeds (Durio Zibethinus Murr) as a Base for Making Edible Film
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Starch is one of the basic ingredients for making edible films (edible coatings), but it tears easily, so it needs the addition of plasticizers. This study aims to make edible film from durian seed starch (Durio zibethinus Murr) with the addition of plasticizers, glycerol and sorbitol and determine its characterization. The results showed that the best edible film was produced by adding 2.5% (w / v) of glycerol and 2% (w / v) of sorbitol. The physical characteristics of the edible film are respectively: thickness 0.1700 mm and 0.1633 mm, tensile strength 0.008 Kgf / mm2 and 0.010 Kgf / mm2, percent elongation 42.76% and 37.13%, elasticity 0.0202 and 0.0272. The chemical characteristics of edible film include: water absorption test of 58.22% and 60.43%, solubility of 40.89% and 26.42%, water vapor transmission rates of 0.2275 g / jamm2 and 0.3127 g / jamm2, and pH 6.90 and 7.85. The results of functional group analysis (FTIR) show that the process of making edible films in this study is a physical mixing process. The shelf life of edible films at room temperature is 5 days and at cold temperature for 7 days. The biodegradability test showed that the edible film in this study could be completely degraded within 7 days. This shows that the durian seed starch edible film is an environmentally friendly packaging.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".