Bibliographic record
Abstract
From October 1 to December 30, 2020, the exhibition “A quarter of a Century preserving Traditions” was held in Khanty-Mansiysk. Dedicated to the anniversary of the Center of Folk Arts and Crafts, it was the result of its twenty-five years of work, numerous projects, scientific research, expeditions and competitions. The article presents an overview of the exposition, which shows works of different techniques and directions of folk art: wood carving, embroidery and weaving, folk costume, ceramics. Materials, plots, forms, ornaments and motives are associated with the mythological ideas of the Ob Ugrians. С 1 октября по 30 декабря 2020 года в Ханты-Мансийске, в Доме-музее народного художника СССР В.А. Игошева, состоялась выставка «Четверть века сохраняя традиции». Посвященная юбилею Центра народных художественных промыслов и ремесел Югры, она явилась итогом его двадцатипятилетней работы, многочисленных проектов, научных исследований, экспедиций и конкурсов. Статья представляет обзор экспозиции, в которой показаны произведения разных техник и направлений народного искусства: резьба по дереву, вышивка и плетение, народный костюм, керамика. Материалы, сюжеты, формы, орнаменты и мотивы связаны с мифологическими представлениями обских угров.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.231 | 0.161 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".