MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142647066 · doi:10.46748/arteuras.2021.01.023

Хранители югорских традиций

2021· article· ru· W3142647066 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A.S. Kharitonova, K.E. Elowsky

Bibliographic record

VenueIskusstvo Evrazii [The Art of Eurasia] · 2021
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrnamentsCarvingExhibitionExposition (narrative)HandicraftMythologyVisual artsQuarter (Canadian coin)ArtWeavingArt historyCraftClothingThe artsStyle (visual arts)HistoryEngineeringArchaeologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From October 1 to December 30, 2020, the exhibition “A quarter of a Century preserving Traditions” was held in Khanty-Mansiysk. Dedicated to the anniversary of the Center of Folk Arts and Crafts, it was the result of its twenty-five years of work, numerous projects, scientific research, expeditions and competitions. The article presents an overview of the exposition, which shows works of different techniques and directions of folk art: wood carving, embroidery and weaving, folk costume, ceramics. Materials, plots, forms, ornaments and motives are associated with the mythological ideas of the Ob Ugrians. С 1 октября по 30 декабря 2020 года в Ханты-Мансийске, в Доме-музее народного художника СССР В.А. Игошева, состоялась выставка «Четверть века сохраняя традиции». Посвященная юбилею Центра народных художественных промыслов и ремесел Югры, она явилась итогом его двадцатипятилетней работы, многочисленных проектов, научных исследований, экспедиций и конкурсов. Статья представляет обзор экспозиции, в которой показаны произведения разных техник и направлений народного искусства: резьба по дереву, вышивка и плетение, народный костюм, керамика. Материалы, сюжеты, формы, орнаменты и мотивы связаны с мифологическими представлениями обских угров.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIskusstvo Evrazii [The Art of Eurasia]Same topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207