MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3142835581 · doi:10.1044/2021_ajslp-20-00157

The Impact of Clear Speech on the Perceptual and Acoustic Properties of Fricative–Vowel Sequences in Speakers With Dysarthria

2021· article· en· W3142835581 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent Martel‐Sauvageau, Myriam Breton, Alexandra Chabot, Mélanie Langlois

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPhonetics and Phonology Research
Canadian institutionsCentre hospitalier universitaire de QuébecUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVowelDysarthriaPsychologyAudiologySpeech recognitionLinguisticsComputer scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Studies have reported that clear speech has the potential to influence suprasegmental and segmental aspects of speech, in both healthy and dysarthric speakers. While the impact of clear speech has been studied on the articulation of individual segments, few studies have investigated its effects on coarticulation with multisegment sequences such as fricative-vowel. Objectives The goals of this study are to investigate, in healthy and dysarthric speech, the impact of clear speech on (a) the perception of anticipatory vowel coarticulation in fricatives and (b) the acoustic characteristics of this effect. Method Ten speakers with dysarthria secondary to idiopathic Parkinson's disease were recruited as well as 10 age- and sex-matched healthy speakers. A sentence reading task was performed in natural and clear speaking conditions. The sentences contained words with the initial fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ preceded by /ə/ and followed by the vowels /i/, /y/, /u/, or /a/. For the perceptual measurements, five listeners were recruited and were asked to predict the upcoming word by listening only to the isolated fricative. Acoustic analyses consisted of spectral moment analysis (M1-M4) on averaged time series. Results Perceptual findings report that identification rates were improved with clear speech for the speakers with dysarthria, but only for the fricative-/i/ sequences. Error pattern analysis indicates that this improvement is associated with an increase in the roundness parameter (lip spreading) identification. Acoustic results are unclear for M1 and M3 but suggest that M2 and M4 differentiation between the rounded versus unrounded vowel contexts is increased with clear speech for the speakers with dysarthria. Discussion Taken together, these findings suggest that clear speech may improve lip coordination in dysarthric speakers with Parkinson's disease. However, the impact of clear speech on the acoustic measures of fricative spectral moments is somewhat limited. This suggests that these metrics, when taken individually, do not capture the entire complexity of fricative-vowel coarticulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Speech-Language PathologySame topicPhonetics and Phonology ResearchFrench-language works237,207