Вивчення історії ЛГБТ-спільноти в міському просторі: доступність джерел та етичні виклики
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study of various aspects of the life of closed and invisible social groups in the recent history of Ukraine and Slobozhanshchina is associated with the need to solve a number of methodological, source and ethical problems. The lack of theoretical reflection on the peculiarities of studying the history of the LGBT community and the limited range of available research on this topic in domestic science pose a number of challenges and problems that can be answered based on the experience of American, British and Canadian scientists, as well as guidelines of Ukrainian researchers in oral history. The specificity of the sources available for the study of urban space in the history of LGBT people is determined by the peculiarities of the representation of their experience, given the attitude of society and its institutions to vulnerable social groups, and the researcher's ability to communicate with the LGBT community. The first and most important source is the oral stories of the direct participants in the creation and operation of a number of important places for the LGBT community in the public space of the city. From the 2000s to the present, the role of Internet forums, websites, mobile applications, as well as publications in the media, electronic and printed publications that contain memories of LGBT people. A promising source is personal belongings, photos and video archives, only a small part of which can be found in the public access. The specificity of the range and availability of sources determines the importance of developing and adhering to appropriate ethical approaches of the researcher. The key principles should be trust, confidentiality, and in most cases anonymity of the respondent in communication and oral testimony, clarity and openness of research goals and objectives, proactivity, tolerance and non-discrimination, maintaining a lasting connection with the LGBT community, return the research results to the community itself in the form of both scientific and popular science publications, events, exhibitions and presentations. The results of such research should be aimed at changing the situation of vulnerable social groups, overcoming barriers to equal rights and opportunities, and addressing a number of socio-cultural, economic, medical and legal issues facing the LGBT community. The analysis of the availability of sources and ethical aspects and the obtained results find practical application in the study of the history of the LGBT community and the urban space of Kharkiv.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".