O Serviço Social e a agenda global: balanço prospectivo. Agenda para o Serviço Social português: que desafios para a profissão?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O Eng. Antonio Guterres, indigitado Secretario-Geral das Nacoes Unidas e um ilustre concidadao, num dos seus discursos recentes, referia:“Nao ha paz sem desenvolvimento e nao ha desenvolvimento sem Paz. Tambem e verdade que nao ha Paz e desenvolvimento, sem respeito pelos Direitos Humanos”. E concluiu: “No mundo de hoje, ninguem pode prosperar se nao puder aproveitar o potencial de toda a gente, homens e mulheres”.Aqui esta um bom mote para falar do Servico Social, dos seus agentes, os Assistentes Sociais e dos desafios que tem de enfrentar.Como sabemos, os Direitos Humanos sao a semente, o horizonte e o principio organizativo do Servico Social, a sua propria razao de existir.Tal determina que a intervencao seja cunhada nos direitos e nao nas necessidades, o que a determina a negacao, por principio, do assistencialismo.Assim, a visao, o horizonte do Servico Social e que ele proprio deixe de ter razao de existir, porque todos os seres humanos na terra gozam dos direitos que a sua condicao humana exige. Sonho ou utopia? Talvez. Mas como diz o poeta da Arrabida, Sebastiao da Gama “Pelo sonho e que vamos... Chegamos, nao chegamos..?”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".