MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3143160050 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10506460.1

Dissecting a Zombie: Shallow Volcanic Structure Revealed by Multiple Geophysical Data Sets at Uturuncu Volcano, Bolivia

2021· preprint· en· W3143160050 on OpenAlexaff
Patricia MacQueen, Joachim Gottsmann, M. E. Pritchard, Nicola Young, Faustino Ticona J., Ruben Tintaya, Thomas Hudson, Ying Liu, J. M. Kendall, Matthew J. Comeau, Martyn Unsworth

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UKNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeologyVolcanoSeismologyGeophysicsCalderaMagnetotelluricsAnomaly (physics)UnrestGravity anomalyPaleontologyElectrical resistivity and conductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uturuncu volcano in southern Bolivia is something of a “zombie” volcano – presumed dead, but showing signs of life. The volcano has not erupted in 250 kyr, but is exhibiting unrest in the form of ground deformation, seismicity, and active fumaroles. Elucidating the subsurface structure of the volcano is key for interpreting this recent unrest. Magnetotelluric measurements revealed alternating high and low resistivity anomalies at depths <10 km beneath the volcano, with a low-resistivity anomaly directly beneath Uturuncu. A key question is, what is the nature of this anomaly? To what extent is it partial melt, a hydrothermal brine reservoir, or a mature ore body? Knowing the density of this anomaly could distinguish between these scenarios, but existing density models of the area lack sufficient resolution. To address this issue, we collected additional gravity measurements on the Uturuncu edifice with 1.5 km spacing in November 2018. Gradient analysis and geophysical inversion of these data revealed several features: a 5 km diameter, high density anomaly beneath the summit of Uturuncu (1 – 3 km elev.), a 20 km diameter ring-shaped negative density anomaly around the volcano (-3 – 4 km elev.), a NNE trending, positive density anomaly northwest of the volcano (0 – 4 km elev.), and a NW trending, negative density anomaly to the southeast. These structures often (but not always) align with resistivity anomalies, features in new seismic tomography models, and relocated earthquake hypocenters. Based on a joint analysis of these data, we interpret the positive density anomaly as a crystallizing dacite pluton, and the negative density ring anomaly as a zone of hydrothermal alteration. Earthquakes around the edges of the crystallizing pluton may represent escaping fluids as the magma cools. The high density anomaly to the northwest likely represents a solidified pluton, and the low density anomaly to the southeast may represent a fractured fault zone. We posit that the alternating zones of high and low resistivity anomalies represent zones of low and high fluid/brine content, respectively. Based on this analysis we suggest that the unrest at Uturuncu is unlikely to be pre-eruptive. This study shows the value of joint analysis of multiple types of geophysical data in evaluating volcanic subsurface structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207