Cardiac Tamponade Presenting as Abdominal Pain and Being the Initial Manifestation of Malignant Disease: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neoplastic pericarditis can be presented as acute pericarditis, pericardial effusion, effusive constrictive pericarditis or cardiac tamponade. For the majority of patients, a clinical manifestation of neoplastic pericarditis is absent or remains unrecognised during their life. A 56 year old male asymptomatic until three days ago that began with intense pain in epigastric region . The yugular vein was distended, breath and heart sounds were slightly decreased. Right-sided abdominal pain especially pronounced in the epigastric and right iliac fossa, his liver was palpable 2 cm below the right costal margin. In first cut of abdominal CT we showed pericardial effusion . The patient improved immediately after thetherapeutic pericardiocentesis. For the study of primary tumor was performed a thoraco-abdominal CT. Showing right hiliar mass, mediastinal lymph nodes, bilateral lung metastases. The patient was diagnosed with stage IV lung carcinoma, initiated the chemotherapy treatment (carboplatin-gemcitabine) by the medical oncology service at our hospital. Cardiac tamponade as the initial manifestation of malignancy is rare and such patients have a very limited expectancy, is because at the time of tumor disease diagnosis it is already advanced . There are few reported cases of patients with pericardial tamponade who presented with abdominal pain. J Med Cases. 2013;4(7):488-490 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jmc1213w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".