MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3143759960 · doi:10.1007/s41999-021-00480-w

Identifying key prescribing cascades in older people (iKASCADE): a transnational initiative on drug safety through a sex and gender lens—rationale and design

2021· article· en· W3143759960 on OpenAlexafffund
Shelley A. Sternberg, Mirko Petrović, Graziano Onder, Antonio Cherubini, Denis O’Mahony, Jerry H. Gurwitz, Francesco Pegreffi, Robín Masón, Jennifer Akerman, Lisa McCarthy, Andrea Lawson, Joyce Li, Wei Wu, Paula A. Rochon

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Geriatric Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSex and Gender in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHorizon 2020 Framework Programme
KeywordsMedicineDelphi methodPatient safetyPresentation (obstetrics)Family medicineHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To describe the objectives and expected impact of an international consortium (iKASCADE) whose purpose is to improve drug safety for older adults by addressing prescribing cascades through a sex and gender lens. The consortium proposes to (a) develop an inventory of clinically relevant prescribing cascades; (b) provide a detailed understanding of sex-specific prescribing cascades in hospital, long-term care, and community settings; (c) foster a greater understanding of similarities or differences regarding prescribing cascades internationally; (d) and provide a nascent understanding of the ways in which gender dimensions may influence the development or treatment of prescribing cascades. It is critically important to examine sex and gender within geriatric pharmacology to better inform recommendations and treatment decisions tailored for older women and men. To describe the objectives, methods and expected impact of an international consortium (iKASCADE) whose purpose is to improve drug safety for older adults by addressing prescribing cascades through a sex and gender lens. To create a comprehensive, internationally relevant inventory of prescribing cascades affecting older adults, the consortium has created a modified Delphi procedure where international experts in prescribing and managing pharmacotherapy for older adults will rank a list of prescribing cascades as to their clinical importance. We will use administrative and clinical data on older adults to evaluate the frequency of prescribing cascades by sex internationally, in the hospital, long-term care and community settings. Finally, we will use semi-structured interviews and realistic, country-specific vignettes, each incorporating a prescribing cascade with identified sex differences, to explore how socially constructed gender roles contribute to the experience, presentation and management of prescribing cascades. The consortium will synthesize the quantitative and qualitative results to produce a position paper and products—aimed at knowledge users within and outside of academia—designed to elevate the importance of integrating a gender dimension in the identification and prevention of prescribing cascades. Findings will improve our understanding of how adverse drug events are different between older women and men and inform the development and dissemination of tailored knowledge translation products to reduce the frequency and impact of prescribing cascades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Geriatric MedicineSame topicSex and Gender in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207