Deep Learning-Based Ground Vibration Monitoring: Reinforcement Learning and RNN–CNN Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This letter studies deep learning-based efficient ground vibration monitoring systems. In this work, artificial intelligence (AI) techniques are adopted to effectively deal with practical issues of data collection and classification. Specifically, we develop a novel energy-efficient data collection scheme by adopting deep Q-network-based reinforcement learning. Also, we propose an enhanced joint recurrent neural network (RNN) and convolutional neural network (CNN) approach for ground vibration classification. The performance of the proposed scheme is evaluated using real-world ground vibration data. The experimental results show that the proposed classification scheme outperforms the best existing scheme with CNN by more than 13% in terms of classification accuracy. It is also shown that the proposed energy management scheme can improve the accuracy of the proposed ground vibration monitoring system by 7.6% over the comparable scheme using equal power allocation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it