MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3144232113 · doi:10.21037/tcr-20-2123

The role of tolvaptan in managing hyponatremia in small cell lung cancer patients with SIADH: a retrospective study of 23 cases

2021· article· en· W3144232113 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Peng Ren, Qiuan Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Cancer Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElectrolyte and hormonal disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcMaster UniversityShandong University
KeywordsTolvaptanHyponatremiaMedicineInternal medicineSyndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretionRetrospective cohort studyUrologyHypertonic salineAntidiureticGastroenterologyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Existing studies have shed light on the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), but data on tolvaptan for the treatment of hyponatremia in SCLC patients remain scarce. Furthermore, the most appropriate initial dose has not been identified. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness, safety, and survival rate associated with tolvaptan in regard to controlling hyponatremia in SCLC patients with the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) and to explore the appropriate initial dose. METHODS: A total of 23 SCLC patients with SIADH treated with tolvaptan were retrospectively reviewed between 2011 and 2019, and the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan were evaluated and compared between a 3.75 mg dose and doses higher than 3.75 mg. Then, the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS) and draw survival curves. RESULTS: In our center, patients had a mean age of 61.7±8.2 years. The mean plasma sodium level after hypertonic saline treatment was (120.7±7.5) mmol/L. The doses of tolvaptan were distributed as follows: 3.75 mg (10 patients), 5 mg (5 patients), 7.5 mg (4 patients), and 15 mg (4 patients). After 3 days of tolvaptan treatment, the mean plasma sodium level was (136.0±4.1) mmol/L, which was significantly higher than the plasma sodium level on admission and before tolvaptan treatment (P<0.05). The mean time for tolvaptan to correct the plasma sodium level was (3.7±5.8) days, and no significant difference was found between the 3.75 mg group and the above 3.75 mg group (P>0.05). Adverse events were observed in 1 patient who presented with severe lethargy and confusion. The median OS was 14.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, no significant difference was found between the 3.75 mg group and the above 3.75 mg group. Less than 15 mg of tolvaptan is enough to stabilize sodium levels for most patients. There is a risk of overcorrection of plasma sodium when using 15 mg of tolvaptan. Tolvaptan can quickly improve performance status and may bring survival benefits to patients. The effect of tolvaptan in patients with SCLC and SIADH should be confirmed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranslational Cancer ResearchSame topicElectrolyte and hormonal disordersFrench-language works237,207