MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3145024036

Prostaglandin Analogues for Ophthalmic Use: A Review of Comparative Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines [Internet]

2020· review· en· W3145024036 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Saadul Islam, Carolyn Spry

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlaucomaOptic nerveIntraocular pressureOphthalmologyMedicineVisual fieldOpen angle glaucomaCorneaCiliary bodyOcular hypertensionTrabecular meshwork
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glaucoma is an umbrella term that refers to eye diseases involving progressive degeneration of the optic nerve. This may lead to gradual irreversible vision loss and potential blindness if not detected or treated early. Although characterized traditionally by an elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), it is now known that glaucoma involves a characteristic atrophy of the optic nerve head, which may or may not be accompanied by elevated IOP. Nonetheless, an elevated IOP is the most important risk factor for glaucoma. IOP is dependent on secretion of aqueous humour by the ciliary body as well as drainage of aqueous humour from the eye. The normal IOP ranges between 10 mmHg and 20 mmHg with an average value of 15 mmHg. Ocular hypertension (OHT) is characterized by a higher than normal IOP level, in the absence of optic nerve damage or visual field loss. Open angle glaucoma (OAG), sometimes referred to as primary open angle glaucoma (POAG), is the most common form of glaucoma, accounting for more than 70% of glaucoma cases. This is caused by a higher concentration of fluid being produced within the eyes, or when the drainage system is not working properly, resulting in a buildup of pressure on the optic nerve, ultimately damaging the optic nerve. A less common type of glaucoma is closed-angle glaucoma or narrow angle glaucoma, which happens when the drainage angle in the eye (formed by the cornea and the iris) closes or becomes blocked.This usually occurs in old age, when the lens in the eye becomes larger, pushing the iris forward and narrowing the space between the iris and the cornea, thereby blocking the aqueous fluid from exiting through the drainage system, resulting in a buildup of fluid and an increase in eye pressure. Secondary glaucoma can occur as a result of other conditions (e.g., infection, inflammation, trauma, or pseudoexfoliation), medication usage (e.g., corticosteroids), or ocular surgery. Finally, in normal tension glaucoma (NTG), the optic nerve is damaged without a concomitant increase in eye pressure. The pathophysiology of NTG is still unclear.There is limited epidemiological data available for glaucoma in Canada. A recently published document by Health Quality Ontario reported more than 400,000 Canadians are affected with glaucoma, with the direct costs of vision loss from glaucoma estimated at $300 million annually. Similar findings were reported from the 2008-2009 Canadian Community Health Survey on Health Aging which estimated that 456,533 Canadians had a diagnosis of glaucoma.Treatments for glaucoma primarily involve lowering IOP levels to a normal range. The target IOP should be modified based on the patient’s age, quality of life (QoL) and risk factors for progression. Treatment strategies for patients with glaucoma include topical or systemic medications, laser therapy, and surgery, although the latter two are less common. Pharmacologic therapy is the most common method of lowering IOP and there are several types of agents available: prostaglandin analogues (PGAs, alternatively defined as prostamides), beta-blockers, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, alpha adrenergic agonists, and direct-acting cholinergic agonists. Of these, the most common first-line therapy is with PGAs due to favourable effectiveness, once-daily administration, and tolerability compared with the other agents.,, Currently available PGAs include latanoprostene bunod (0.024%), latanoprost (LAT, 0.005%), travoprost (TRA, 0.004%), bimatoprost (BIM, available in two doses, 0.03% and 0.01%), and tafluprost (TAF). Patients who do not meet their target IOP may receive an additional agent, often timolol (TIM, 0.5%), a beta-blocker.In 2015, CADTH prepared a Rapid Response Summary with Critical Appraisal on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of BIM compared with other PGAs for ophthalmic use. The objective of the current report is to evaluate the evidence published as of 2015 on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of BIM versus other PGAs for ophthalmic use. Additionally, evidence-based guidelines regarding the use of BIM for elevated intraocular pressure will be reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.290
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGlaucoma and retinal disorders→French-language works237,207→