MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3145267998 · doi:10.1101/2021.04.03.438283

Impaired top-down auditory processing despite extensive single-neuron responses during human sleep

2021· preprint· en· W3145267998 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hanna Hayat, Amit Marmelshtein, Aaron J. Krom, Yaniv Sela, Ariel Tankus, Ido Strauss, Firas Fahoum, Itzhak Fried, Yuval Nir

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIsraeli Centers for Research ExcellenceAzrieli FoundationIsrael Science FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsNon-rapid eye movement sleepWakefulnessNeuroscienceSleep spindlePsychologySleep (system call)PolysomnographySensory systemArousalNeuroscience of sleepStimulationAudiologyElectroencephalographyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep in all species is universally defined as a reversible, homeostatically-regulated state of a reduced behavioral responsiveness, with a high arousal threshold in response to external sensory stimulation 1 . However, it remains unclear whether sleep mainly gates motor output or affects responses along sensory pathways, and whether sleep primarily modulates specific aspects of the sensory response such as feedforward vs. feedback signaling 2–7 . Here, we simultaneously recorded polysomnography, iEEG, microwire LFPs, and neuronal spiking activity during wakefulness and sleep in 13 epilepsy patients implanted with clinical depth electrodes, while presenting auditory stimuli (e.g. click-trains, words, music). The results revealed robust spiking and induced LFP high-gamma (80-200Hz) power responses during both NREM and REM sleep across the lateral temporal lobe. The magnitude of the responses was only moderately attenuated in sleep, most notably for late responses beyond the early auditory cortex. Nonetheless, sleep responses maintained their tight locking with soundwave envelopes and their information content was only minimally affected. In contrast, a decrease in LFP alpha-beta (10-30Hz) power responses was prevalent in wakefulness but significantly disrupted in sleep. Entrainment to 40 Hz click-trains was comparable across REM sleep and wakefulness, but reduced in NREM sleep. In conclusion, our results establish the presence of extensive and robust auditory responses during sleep while LFP alpha-beta power decrease, likely reflecting top-down processes 8–10 , is deficient. More broadly, our findings suggest that feedback signalling is key to conscious sensory processing 11–13 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicNeural dynamics and brain function→French-language works237,207→