Graphical-model based high dimensional generalized linear models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the problem of both prediction and model selection in high dimensional generalized linear models. Predictive performance can be improved by leveraging structure information among predictors. In this paper, a graphic model-based doubly sparse regularized estimator is discussed under the high dimensional generalized linear models, that utilizes the graph structure among the predictors. The graphic information among predictors is incorporated node-by-node using a decomposed representation and the sparsity is encouraged both within and between the decomposed components. We propose an efficient iterative proximal algorithm to solve the optimization problem. Statistical convergence rates and selection consistency for the doubly sparse regularized estimator are established in the ultra-high dimensional setting. Specifically, we allow the dimensionality grows exponentially with the sample size. We compare the estimator with existing methods through numerical analysis on both simulation study and a microbiome data analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it