Graphene/Carbon Nanaotube Aerogel with Ultra-high Adsorption Capacity for the Isolation of Hemoglobin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
3-Dimensional graphene oxide / carbon nanotubes( GO / CNTs) aerogel was prepared via freeze drying technique,and the as-prepared GO / CNTs aerogel exhibits excellent adsorption performance towards protein species under hydrophobic interaction. At p H = 8. 0,high adsorption efficiency of hemoglobin( Hb) was achieved,while virtually no adsorption of serum album was observed. This offers the possibility to realize the selective isolation of Hb from complex matrices. An adsorption capacity up to 3793. 3 mg / g was achieved for the GO / CNTs aerogel,suggesting the great potential of this aerogel in the removal of abundant Hb. The adsorbed Hb could be readily stripped using Britton-Robinson buffer of p H = 11. 5,giving rise to a recovery of67%. Circular dichroism spectra indicated that the adsorption / desorption on the surface of GO / CNTs aerogel poses virtually no effect on the configuration of Hb. The GO / CNTs aerogel is practically applied to the selective isolation of Hb from human blood and SDS-PAGE assays demonstrate high purity of hemoglobin in the eluate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".