MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3146540802

Identification of the Flavone in the Flower Bud of Panax Quinquefolium and Its Content Determination in the Different Parts

2001· article· en· W3146540802 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meng Meng, Xiang-ying

Bibliographic record

Venue高等学校化学研究:英文版 · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGinseng Biological Effects and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKaempferolBotanyBiologyFlavonoidHorticulture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Panax quinquefolium L. Belongs to the Panax genus of the Araliaceae. It originates in America and Canada. Its roots, a famous and expensive traditional Chinese medicinal material, have been studied continually since its successful cultivation in China in the 1970s. In recent years the development and utilization researches of its aerial part, which was abandoned in the past, have been conducted. The constituent studies on the leaves, stems and fruits have been reported. But no information about the flower buds has been found in literatures. The authors have reported a study about the chemical constituents of the flower buds of the P. Quinquefolium cultivated in China. In the present work two flavonoids(namely kaempferol and panasenoside) in the flower buds of the P. Quinquefulium cultivated in China were extracted, isolated, and identified. Since the medicinal materials were processed with an unusual treatment, the content determination of the monomeric and total flavonoid in the different parts were performed correctly with the methods of dual-wavelength TLC-scan, and UV-absorption, and it was discovered that there were flavonoids in the roots and fruits of the P. Quinquefolium. The scientific basis was provided for the utilization of the flower buds and other parts resources of the P.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue高等学校化学研究:英文版Same topicGinseng Biological Effects and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207