MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3147735699 · doi:10.1002/eqe.3453

Simulating nonstationary and non‐Gaussian vector ground motions with time‐ and frequency‐dependent lagged coherence

2021· article· en· W3147735699 on OpenAlexafffund
X.Z. Cui, Han Hong

Bibliographic record

VenueEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFourier transformCoherence (philosophical gambling strategy)GaussianOrthonormal basisAlgorithmGaussian processDiscrete Fourier transform (general)AmplitudeFast Fourier transformMathematicsComputer scienceShort-time Fourier transformMathematical analysisFourier analysisPhysicsOpticsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Seismic ground motions at multiple sites are nonstationary and non‐Gaussian with potentially time‐ and frequency‐dependent coherence, although the nonstationarity or non‐Gaussian or time‐dependent coherence aspects are often neglected because of lack of algorithm or method to take all these aspects into account to simulate synthetic ground motion records at multiple sites. In the present study, an iterative power and amplitude correction algorithm is proposed to simulate the nonstationary and non‐Gaussian vector process and takes into account time‐ and frequency‐dependent coherence. The algorithm usually converges within 10 iterations. It can be viewed as the extension of the well‐known iterative amplitude adjust Fourier transform algorithm for generating a vector of surrogates. The proposed algorithm uses the S‐transform and discrete orthonormal S‐transform rather than the ordinary Fourier transform. The adequacy of the proposed algorithm is validated numerically by using simulated ground motions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarthquake Engineering & Structural DynamicsSame topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207