MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3148617469

Shock tube study on auto-ignition characteristics of kerosene/air mixtures

2011· article· zh· W3148617469 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yingjia, Huang, ZuoHua, Wang, Jinhua, Xu, Shengli

Bibliographic record

Venue中国科学通报:英文版 · 2011
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthylbenzeneDecaneShock tubeIgnition systemChemistryCombustionAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Shock (circulatory)KeroseneBenzeneThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryChromatographyShock waveOrganic chemistryPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

点火延期时间在在 1445 和 1650 K 之间的温度在反映的冲击波后面为煤油 / 空气混合物被获得,在 0.11 MPa 和 1.0 的等价比率的一个压力。有 Laval 嘴的一台 nebulization 设备习惯于使成雾状煤油并且形成一个喷雾器阶段,它在事件冲击波后面很快蒸发并且扩散。在反映的冲击波后面的混合物汽车点燃。ICCD 被用来设想煤油 / 空气混合物点火特征。混合物点火紧张随起始的温度的增加增加。当飞机和不连续的火焰在 1560 K 上存在时,连续、不规则的火焰在 1515 K 下面存在。点火延期时间随起始的温度的增加减少。试验性的数据证明对结果的好同意在文学以前报导了。一个新代理人(由 10% 甲苯, 10% ethylbenzene 和 80% n-decane 组成) 为煤油被建议。Honnet et al.s 机制被用来模仿煤油的点火,计算与试验性的数据同意很好。反应 H+O2?OH+O 的敏感,显示出最高的敏感到点火延期时间,随温度的增加增加。与 O2 突破 CH3 的反应的链加速全部的反应率, n-decane 的 H 原子抽象控制全部的反应率。生产和即时热生产的率显示那二反应, H+O2?OH+O 和 O+H2?OH+H,是对形成的关键反应哦激进分子,以及主要吸热的反应。然而, R3 的反应在点火期间是主要的热版本反应。火焰结构分析证明起始的压力作为公司稍微被增加, H2O 将出现在主要点火前。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue中国科学通报:英文版Same topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207