Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT/RESUME In this paper, I recount the circumstances which have caused me to question deeply my own complicity in Eurocentric education, which is really we have to offer our Aboriginal students. Coming from my position as a white, female, middle-aged university professor with a history of school teaching and school counselling, I outline the concerns I have with both schools and faculties of education, fearing personal complicity in cultural genocide. In particular, I am concerned with three things: one, how we frame and name our own racism -- to come to feel comfortable talking about our own biases and prejudicial thoughts, actions, and attitudes--as a necessary first step to action; two, how we disadvantage Aboriginal students in our universities, for whom success may require some form of personal amputation, and three, how we, as teacher educators, can begin to model, through our own culturally sensitive actions and through our teaching, ways of becoming culturally sensitive classroom teachers. While I do not provide answers to the thorny question of what to do, I do hold out hope that working in arrangements of mutual respect with those of another culture can lead us to idiosyncratic and powerful models of change. Dans cet article je racconte les circonstances qui m'ont cause de questionner d'une facon profonde ma propre complicite dans l'education eurocentrique, qui est vraiment tout ce que nous avons offrir a nos etudiants autochtones. A partir de ma position comme un professeur d'une universite et d'une personne qui est blanche, feminine et entre deux ages, avec une histoire d'enseignement et d'orientation scolaires, j'expose dans les grandes lignes les inquietudes que j'ai avec autant les ecoles que les facultes d'education, ayant peur de complicite personnelle dans la genocide culturelle. En particulier, trois choses me preoccupent. La premiere chose est comment on encadre et nomme notre propre racisme -- arriver a sentir a l'aise en discutant de nos propres prejuges et nos pensees, nos actions et nos attitudes prejudiciables -- comme un premier pas necessaire pour l'action. La deuxieme chose est comment on defavorise les etudiants autochtones dans nos universites pour qui le succes peut exiger quelque forme d'amp utation personelle. La troisieme chose est comment nous, en tant qu'educateurs des enseignants, peuvent commencer a modeler au moyen de nos propres actions culturellement sensibles, et au moyen de notre enseignment, des manieres de devenir des professeurs culturellement sensibles dans la salle de classe. Tandis que je ne fournis pas de responses a la question epineuse de quoi faire, je conserve toujours l'espoir que le fait de travailler dans des arrangements de respect mutuel avec ceux d'une autre culture puisse nous mener a des modeles particuliers et puissants du changement. Introduction I am a white, middle-aged, female university professor. I have been an educator for more than thirty years -- mostly in schools working with underprivileged students. As a teacher I had ongoing concerns about how we frame children and label the pictures so constructed. I have found that here in the university we also have ways of framing those of our students who are different. We less often deal with those who do not learn in the way we deem appropriate or with those whose poverty hampers learning. Here we deal with those from different cultures and struggle with the ways in which they do not fit our mold. Particularly in my small prairie university, we face the challenges offered us by our Aboriginal students. My hope is that we learn to listen, my fear is that we will continue to force those who are different into the one size fits all mould which marks a successful university graduate. In our teacher education faculty, access programs to Northern, Native, and Hutterite populations have been in place for some years. Most of our classes on campus have some Aboriginal students. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".