Effect of maturity on physicochemical and cooking characteristics in yellow peas (<i>Pisum sativum</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wang, N. and Castonguay, G. 2014. Effect of maturity on physicochemical and cooking characteristics in yellow peas (Pisum sativum). Can. J. Plant Sci. 94: 565–571. The effect of maturity on physicochemical and cooking properties of yellow peas was investigated. Results indicated that when compared with mature yellow peas, immature yellow peas exhibited significantly lower seed weight (16.4–18.1% less) and smaller seed size (5.9–6.9% less), but higher water hydration capacity (3.7–11.5% more). Significant shorter cooking time but higher firmness value of cooked seeds was observed for immature yellow peas than for mature yellow peas. Immature yellow peas contained significantly higher mean protein content (254.2 vs. 234.6 g kg −1 DM), higher mean crude fiber (67.8 vs. 63.0 g kg −1 DM), and higher mean ash content (31.5 vs. 29.4 g kg −1 DM), but significantly lower mean starch content (432.5 vs. 451.3 g kg −1 DM) as compared with mature yellow peas. Sucrose content was significantly higher in immature yellow peas than that in mature yellow peas, whereas stachyose and verbascose contents were significantly higher in mature yellow peas than in immature yellow peas. Phytic acid content in immature yellow peas was significantly higher than that in mature yellow peas, while trypsin inhibitor activity was not significant. This information will be useful in setting the grading standards for yellow peas in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".