Bibliographic record
Abstract
I was pleased to read the article from Wallace1 describing a simple technique to guide the capsulorhexis tear to produce a round, centered, and predictably sized anterior continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC). I have successfully used this technique for the past 18 months. It is particularly useful when the pupil dilates eccentrically and the usual cues to center the CCC are absent. In addition to reducing the incidence of posterior capsule opacification, ensuring 360-degree overlap of the optic by the anterior capsule rim reduces the incidence of photopsias from square-edged intraocular lenses (IOLs) by encasing the IOL edge within the capsular envelope. The stability of a single-piece acrylic IOL with soft haptics is also enhanced. The anterior capsule opening is predictably sized and is large enough to maximize the available optic to view the peripheral retina. The corneal mark technique can also be used in patients who have had peribulbar or retrobulbar blocks. A modified optical zone marker with 4 prongs at 90 degrees to each other and a total length of 11.0 mm is used to center the marker by aligning the tips of the prongs with the limbus. To ensure this technique's success, the corneal plane and the anterior capsule plane must be parallel with a focal plane of the operating microscope to avoid parallax errors. The surgeon must be careful not to confuse the corneal mark with the anterior capsule rim at the time of IOL implantation. Rodney I. Kellen MB, BCH, MMED, FRCOPTH, FRCSC Winnepeg, Manitoba, Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".