Exploring the Relationship between Preprocessing and Hyperparameter Tuning for Vibration-Based Machine Fault Diagnosis Using CNNs
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper demonstrates the differences between popular transformation-based input representations for vibration-based machine fault diagnosis. This paper highlights the dependency of different input representations on hyperparameter selection with the results of training different configurations of classical convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with three common benchmarking datasets. Raw temporal measurement, Fourier spectrum, envelope spectrum, and spectrogram input types are individually used to train CNNs. Many configurations of CNNs are trained, with variable input sizes, convolutional kernel sizes and stride. The results show that each input type favors different combinations of hyperparameters, and that each of the datasets studied yield different performance characteristics. The input sizes are found to be the most significant determiner of whether overfitting will occur. It is demonstrated that CNNs trained with spectrograms are less dependent on hyperparameter optimization over all three datasets. This paper demonstrates the wide range of performance achieved by CNNs when preprocessing method and hyperparameters are varied as well as their complex interaction, providing researchers with useful background information and a starting place for further optimization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it