Complicated Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection (SCAD) Culminating in Aneurysm Formation: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Is Preferable Over Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Peripartum SCAD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), most frequently occurring in young females of reproductive age, and has a high mortality rate. Currently, no guidelines are available to direct treatment. We report a case of a 29-year-old female with complications of SCAD treated with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), resulting in a better outcome as compared to that of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Our patient presented with class IV angina one-year post-PCI following postpartum SCAD. Left heart catheterization (LHC) reported SCAD involving the ostium of the left circumflex (LCX) and then cutting off the left marginal artery, which was followed by a 2.5 x 28 mm Synergy drug-eluting stent (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) x1 in the lateral branch of the bifurcating marginal system with good coronary stent results. Repeat LHC one-year after the SCAD was significant for a large aneurysm in the distal left main coronary artery (LCA) extending into the LCX with evidence of a residual large false lumen (0.41 sq cm), as compared to the narrow segment of the true lumen (0.15 sq cm). Compared to the distal LCA area (0.49 sq cm), the true lumen of the LCA had severe stenosis. The patient underwent three-vessel CABG (left internal mammary artery (LIMA)-> left anterior descending artery (LAD), right internal mammary artery (RIMA)->first obtuse marginal (OM1), saphenous vein graft (SVG)->second obtuse marginal (OM2)) with sternal plating. The patient was doing well three months post-CABG with complete resolution of the pain, which was unattainable by PCI. Our report suggests that CABG may be preferable over PCI in the peripartum SCAD to avoid complications or sudden cardiac death from the extension of the dissection and aneurysm formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".