Bibliographic record
Abstract
At the highest level of government, Canada, Mexico, and the United States are committed to a long-range vision to develop a new tri-national partnership. In a joint statement on November 30, 2004, President George W. Bush and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin stated their intent to develop a "new partnership in North America (designed) to deepen our cooperation (and) continue close cooperation with Mexico." Going beyond the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), this "new partnership" will address more than just economic integration. Specifically, the partnership will "set an agenda designed to increase the security, prosperity, and quality of life of our citizens." Similarly, Mexican President Vicente Fox has made North American integration a priority since the start of his administration. This commitment to develop a North American community is commendable, but not sufficient to turn this shared vision into reality. Consensus among the top three leaders helps guide decisions and policy, but does not replace a strategy. This paper offers a politically feasible strategy to help energize relations with Mexico and identifies creative policy options to strengthen continental defense. The intent is to offer a roadmap to help navigate political pitfalls with an emphasis on immediate steps NORAD and U.S. NORTHCOM can pursue to strengthen aerospace defense, cover gaps, and improve planning. A discussion of options to strengthen continental defense cannot be adequately covered without a broader discussion of continental security. Continental security and defense are intimately intertwined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".