MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3150232495 · doi:10.51665/al-duhaa.001.01.0050

(سامی ادیان میں انسانی عظمت باعتبارپیدائش وافزائش نسل انسانی (ایک تقابلی جائزہ

2020· article· en· W3150232495 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAl-Duhaa · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicQur’anic Interpretation Studies
Canadian institutionsAbbott (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHonorDignityAdam and EvePhilosophyTheologyEnvironmental ethicsLawPolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allah is the Creator of the universe, and the best among His creation is human being. He has blessed humans with great honor and dignity. This honor began from the creation of first human, i.e., Hazrat Adam (A.S.). Allah has created Hazrat Adam (A.S) from His own hands while everything else by His command, this makes human distinct among His creations. During the gathering of angels, He said, “I am sending Hazrat Adam (A.S) as my deputy on the earth”. Holy Quran provides detailed elaboration on the creation of Hazrat Adam (A.S) and the birth of the mankind. Further, the Quran also covers the discussion on the mass used in different stages during the creation of a mankind. The human creation is also discussed in Bible as well. This paper provides comparative study of commonalities and unique aspects in different stages of human birth provided by Quran and Bible.
 Keywords: Creator , Creation ,Mankind , Honor ,Dignity, Quran ,Bible Comparative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it