MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3150521200

Developmental and Anatomical Studies on the Root of Platycodon grandiflorum A.DC

2014· article· en· W3150521200 on OpenAlexaff
Tan Linglin

Bibliographic record

VenueXibei zhiwu xuebao · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVascular cambiumXylemSecondary growthParenchymaCambiumMeristemEpidermis (zoology)Vascular bundlePhloemBotanyBiologyVascular tissueCortex (anatomy)SteleAnatomyShoot
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development and the structures of the annual and the perennial tap roots of Platycodon grandiflorum were studied with the paraffin section and the semi-thin section.The results showed that the development of P.grandiflorumroot could be divided into four stages:promeristem,primary meristem,primary growth and secondary growth.The promeristem consists of three groups of initial cells;the primary meristem is composed of calyptrogens,primordial epidermis,periblem and plerome.The primary structure includes epidermis,cortex and stele.Parenchyma cells in cortex are dominant.The primary xylem is diarch. The secondary growth depends on activities of the vascular cambium and the cork cambium.The secondary structure includes periderm and secondary vascular tissue from the outside to the inside.Parenchyma cells are prominent in the secondary vascular tissue,and only small amount of vascular elements are scattered in them.The perennial roots have the similar structure to the annual one,but there are some differences in the length and the diameter of the tap root,the thickness of periderm and the area ratio between the xylem and the phloem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueXibei zhiwu xuebaoSame topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207