Survey： Use of Acupuncture for the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain by Physicians and Physiotherapists in Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
目的：调查加拿大针灸从业人员对针灸治疗急性腰痛的有效性及相关费用的认识，从而确定针灸在急性腰痛治疗中的应用情况。方法：于1996年9月对安大咯加拿大针灸基金会的285名会员发放问卷，只对内科医生及理疗医生的反馈问卷进行统计分析。结果：281名符合条件的会员，197名完成了问卷（回收率70．1％），45．0％为内科医生，55．0％为理疗医生。其中87．0％的人过去使用过针灸疗法治疗急性腰痛，66．O％的人调查时正在使用，87．0％的人表示将来会继续使用。87．0％的反馈者认为针灸治疗急性腰痛是有效的，60．0％的人认为针灸疗法可以阻止急性腰痛的发展。针灸平均每次费用为$28，必需的平均治疗次数为5．7次。结论：多数反馈者对针灸治疗急性腰痛持肯定态度，他们在临床上也经常使用针灸疗法治疗此病。绝大多数反馈者认为针灸治疗急性腰痛是有效的。此外，超过一半的反馈者相信针灸可以阻止急性腰痛的病情发展。虽然本研究调查的针灸从业者坚信针灸治疗急性腰痛是有效的，但需要高质量的大样本调查予以验证。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".