La traduction comme instrument de défense et de résistance des Canadiens francophones
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La presse ancienne canadienne est un témoin privilégié des changements politiques et sociaux survenus pendant lexixe siècle au Canada. Dans cette presse, la traduction occupe une place importante, puisque les journaux publiés à l’étranger et en langue étrangère sont la principale source d’information des rédacteurs de l’époque. L’un des premiers périodiques publiés à Montréal (1826-1899),La Minerve, revêt une importance particulière car il est publié tout au long duxixe siècle. Ce périodique fait d’ailleurs l’objet d’une activité traductionnelle intense. L’étude de la traduction dansLa Minervepermet d’observer le « rapport d’inégalité politique » (Simon 1989 : 19) entre le Canada anglais et le Canada français. Les exemples cités démontrent que la traduction dansLa Minerveest employée en tant qu’instrument de défense du peuple canadien francophone, entouré d’anglophones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".