MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3151838776 · doi:10.1080/15622975.2021.1907711

Genome-wide association study of suicidal behaviour severity in mood disorders

2021· article· en· W3151838776 on OpenAlexafffund
Clement C. Zai, Chiara Fabbri, Georgina M. Hosang, Ruo Su Zhang, Emiko Koyama, Vincenzo De Luca, Arun K. Tiwari, Nicole King, John S. Strauss, Ian Jones, Lisa Jones, Gerome Breen, Anne Farmer, Peter McGuffin, John B. Vincent, James L. Kennedy, Cathryn M. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and AlcoholismMedical Research CouncilCollege of Pharmacy, University of MichiganEuropean CommissionKing's College LondonNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthBarts CharityCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCentre for Addiction and Mental Health FoundationNational Institute of Mental HealthInternational Bipolar FoundationGlaxoSmithKlineSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustNational Institute on Drug AbuseRyan Licht Sang Bipolar FoundationNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and DepressionFondazione Umberto VeronesiUniversity of Michigan
KeywordsAssociation (psychology)Mood disordersGenome-wide association studyMoodClinical psychologyMedicinePsychiatryPsychologyGeneticsGenotypeBiologyAnxietyGenePsychotherapistSingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Suicide is a major public health problem and it has a prominent genetic component. We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of suicidal behaviour severity. METHODS: = 3506) for the GWAS. We also performed polygenic risk score analyses to explore genetic sharing between suicidal behaviour severity and a number of phenotypes, including bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, alcoholism, post-traumatic stress disorder, impulsivity, insomnia, educational attainment, loneliness, maltreatment, and amygdala volume. RESULTS: We did not detect genome-wide significant findings at the single-marker or gene level. We report a number of suggestive single-marker and gene-based findings. Our polygenic risk score analyses did not yield significant findings with these phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: Larger sample sizes are required to detect moderate effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.299

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe World Journal of Biological PsychiatrySame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207