MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3152056519 · doi:10.71318/apom.2001.55.3.154

Yield, Fruit Size, Red Color, and Estimated CropValue in the NC-40 1990 Cultivar/Rootstock Trial inVirginia

2001· article· en· W3152056519 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John A. Barden, Richard P. Marini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of American Pomological Society · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultivarRootstockBiologyYield (engineering)CropHorticultureValue (mathematics)AgronomyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An NC-140 apple cultivar/rootstock trial was conducted near Blacksburg, VA from 1990 through 1999. In addition to the four cultivars common to all sites (‘Golden Delicious’, ‘Jonagold’, ‘Empire’, and ‘Rome’), we also had ‘Stayman’, and ‘York’. Rootstocks were Mark, Ottawa 3 (O.3), Budagovsky 9 (B.9), Mailing 9 EMLA (M.9EMLA), and Mailing 26 EMLA (M.26EMLA). Our objective in this supplemental study was to evaluate cultivar and rootstock effects on yield, distribution of fruit sizes, and color in order to estimate value of the crop. After eight years of cropping, there were very few significant cultivar x rootstock interactions; therefore, mostly main effects are presented. Fruit size was largest for ‘Rome’ and ‘Jonagold’, intermediate for ‘Stayman’ and ‘York’, and smallest for ‘Golden Delicious’ and ‘Empire’. Trees on M.26EMLA and M.9EMLA produced somewhat larger fruit than did trees on Mark and O.3. Fruit from trees on B.9 were intermediate in size. Red color was variable, so in spite of significant differences, general conclusions were impossible. Projected value/tree for fresh fruit (‘Empire’, ‘Rome’, and ‘Stayman’) based on yield, fruit size, and red color was greatest for trees on M.26EMLA and M.9EMLA, intermediate for trees on O.3, and lowest for trees on Mark and B.9. In estimated value for processing, ‘York’ was higher than ‘Golden Delicious’, and fruit from trees on M26EMLA, O.3, and M.9EMLA were higher in value than those from trees on Mark and B.9. As apple rootstocks have been evaluated in NC-140 trials, prime attention has been paid to survival, tree size, precocity, yield, and mean fruit size (1, 10, 11). In some cases, there have been data published on fruit quality attributes such as soluble solids levels, starch indices, and maturity ratings (2, 3, 4). However, because of limited time and resources, most of the fruit size data have been based on mean fruit weight determined from a 50-fruit sub-sample per tree (10, 11). Unfortunately, mean fruit weight provides no information on either the range or distribution of fruit sizes. Therefore, economic projections of the relative value of the crop from the test trees is impossible. As a supplement to the 1990 NC-140 Apple Cultivar/Rootstock Trial, we sized all fruit for six of the eight years in which fruit were harvested. In addition, a sub-sample of fruits was evaluated for red color. From a combination of yield data within these two data sets, we estimated crop values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of American Pomological SocietySame topicPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFrench-language works237,207