MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3152077127 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2021.3068291

Readout Distance Enhancement of Battery-Free Harmonic Transponder

2021· article· en· W3152077127 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaoqiang Gu, Wentao Lin, Simon Hemour, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDiplexerTransponder (aeronautics)HarmonicElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringBandwidth (computing)DiodeEngineeringComputer sciencePhysicsTelecommunicationsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work proposes to enlarge the maximum readout distance of battery-free harmonic transponders through a careful Schottky diode selection and a consideration of low-temperature operations. Diode SMS7621 is identified to deliver lower conversion loss (CL) of harmonic transponders based on a diode selection guide. Moreover, an analytical method for studying temperature effects on the transponder CL performance is introduced and derived with satisfactory accuracy. A diplexer inserted in the harmonic transponder design can help reduce the antenna number. To mitigate matching difficulties at both fundamental and second-harmonic frequencies, a third-order diplexer is developed to enhance its bandwidth performance. Experimental verification has shown that low-temperature operations can effectively reduce the CL of the SMS7630-based harmonic transponder, thus increasing its readout distance. Specifically, its maximum readout distance at -40 °C has increased by more than 10%, from 6.4 to 7.1 m, compared with that at +40 °C. A complete harmonic transponder based on SMS7621, with dimensions of 85 mm ×45 mm has reached a maximum readout distance of 8 m when the fundamental frequency is 3.5 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207