Safety and immunogenicity of lyophilized, live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine in non-human primate model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of lyophilized, live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (H2 strain) in rhesus monkeys Methods Nine adult rhesus monkeys were used as experimental animals The rhesus monkeys without anti HAV were divided randomly into the aqueous vaccination group (4 rhesus monkeys), the lyophilized vaccination group (3 rhesus monkeys), and the control group (2 rhesus monkeys) Monkeys were inoculated by intramuscular injection, with control monkeys being inoculated with Minimum Essential Medium Eagle (MEM) Following vaccination, the monkeys were observed for the development of diarrhoea and other adverse side effects, such as changes in appetite, frequency of defaecation and stool consistency for seven days At the weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 positnoculation, the peripheral blood was collected from all animals and assayed for anti HAV and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), at weeks 0, 4 and 8 postinocuation, needle biopsy specimens were taken at weeks 0, 4, 8 and 12, all monkeys were sacrificed and tissue samples were taken from liver, lung, heart, kidney and brain for pathological examination at week 12 Results Animals were immunized with a dose of 7 0 logTCID 50 /ml which is stable after freeze drying During the 12 week observation, no animals showed abnormal elevations of liver enzymes (ALT and AST) and no change in appetite or activity Two monkeys (one in the aqueous group and the other in lyophilized group) showed possible lesions at week 8 The lyophilized vaccine, in addition to eliciting an anti HAV IgG response similar to aqueous vaccine ( P 0 05), also showed IgM anti HAV response at week 2 which was not observed with aqueous vaccine Conclusions These results demonstrate that lyophilized, live hepatitis A vaccine is safe and highly immunogenic in primates, supporting its further evaluation in human clinical studies
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".