STUDY ON QUANTITATIVE GRADE ADMINISTRATION OF FOOD HYGIENE IN JIUJIANG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[Objective] To investigate the hygiene situation of food industry in Jiujiang;to analyze and assess the execution of Quantitative Grade Administration of Food Hygiene;to find the improvements and defects during the execution;to give suggestions on supervision strategy for next year.[Methods] General survey was made and data on Quantitative Grade Administration of Food Hygiene were collected for every quarter of 2006-2007.[Results] From 2006 to 2007,the number of licensed food-supplying units had almost doubled.Among all units(4 766,4th quarter in 2007),small ones had a proportion above 80%.They majorly belonged to C and D grade hygiene grade.The rest 20% middle-large units majorly(78.3%) belonged to hygiene B and C grade.Only 10 got A(1.2%).[Conclusion] Food industry is getting bigger and bigger in Jiujiang these years.But the majority is small units with poor hygiene condition,probably due to less knowledge,suboptimal hardware,and ignorance of the laws.The Middle-large units are better but still sub-optimal.In future,more efforts should be made in food supervision,especially the propagation of Quantitative Grade Administration of Food Hygiene,both among food-supplying units and customers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".