MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3152595387 · doi:10.24908/iqurcp.10113

15. Barriers to the use of Femoral Nerve Blocks to Manage Hip Fracture Pain among Frail Elders

2018· article· en· W3152595387 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Madison Riddell

Bibliographic record

VenueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference Proceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip and Femur Fractures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFemoral nerveFemoral nerve blockFemoral fractureRandomized controlled trialEmergency departmentHip fracturePhysical therapyMEDLINELimitingMeta-analysisSurgeryOsteoporosisFemurInternal medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Hip fractures are a common source of pain and related morbidity among the frail elderly. One technique that has been shown to adequately manage pain in this population is the femoral nerve block. However, it is not currently employed routinely in Alberta emergency departments. Objective: The first objective was to systematically review the recent literature around the use of femoral nerve blocks. The second objective was to survey physicians about the potential barriers to routinely performing femoral nerve blocks in the emergency department. Materials and Methods: Searches of Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Trials database were conducted between 2010 and 2014 to identify randomized control trials examining the use of femoral nerve blocks in the ED to manage acute hip fracture pain among older adults (65 years of age and greater). The results of the systematic review were used to inform the development of the barrier survey. The survey was distributed to physician members of the Alberta Emergency and Bone & Joint Strategic Clinical Networks. Results: Seven randomized control trials were included in the review. Four studies employed a single femoral block, while three employed continuous (catheter placed) femoral blocks. All of the studies reported statistically significant reductions in pain. All but one study reported that patients treated with femoral nerve blocks consumed significantly less rescue analgesia. Finally, there were no significant adverse effects reported with the femoral block procedure. Surveys are still being collected and evaluated. Conclusions: Femoral nerve blocks appear to have benefits both in terms of decreasing pain and limiting the amount of systemic opioids administered to frail older adults experiencing a hip fracture. The results of this review and the barriers survey will help inform the development of knowledge translation strategies to increase the routine use of femoral nerve blocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInquiry Queen s Undergraduate Research Conference ProceedingsSame topicHip and Femur FracturesFrench-language works237,207