Anishnabeg children and youth's experiences and understandings of oral health in rural Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Children's oral health is a prevalent health concern in Indigenous communities in Canada and globally. Compared to an early childhood caries prevalence rate of 57% in non-Indigenous Canadian school-age children, some Indigenous communities face rates exceeding 90%. Despite the high prevalence rates of caries and other oral health concerns in Indigenous children, qualitative research on oral health has focused on Indigenous adults. This study sought to uncover children and youths' oral health experiences and understandings in two Anishnabeg communities in Quebec. METHODS: A focused ethnography was conducted using participatory research principles, and included interviews with key informants, children, and youth, as well as participant observation of oral health activities. Analysis was iterative and concurrent with data collection. RESULTS: Themes include (1) children and youth primarily described oral health in relation to their teeth only; (2) children and youth have motivators for maintaining oral health, including consequences of poor oral health and its influence on self-presentation; (3) oral health is 'put on the side table', and not highly prioritized by children or adults; (4) children and youth recognize the people in their lives that influence their oral health; and (5) children and youth demonstrate agency in oral health matters. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the valuable perspectives that Anishnabeg children and youth have regarding their oral health, and are of value to other Indigenous communities that strive to address similar oral health concerns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".