MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MORTALITY RATE OF PATIENTS WITH ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION AND MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT

2021· article· en· W3152669013 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Teodora Yaneva‐Sirakova, A Dimov, Dobrin Vassilev, Latchezar Traykov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Systems and Public Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressureGeriatric Depression ScaleInternal medicineAmbulatory blood pressureCardiologyAmbulatoryPopulationMontreal Cognitive AssessmentRisk factorNeuropsychologyMortality rateLogistic regressionDepression (economics)DiseaseCognitive impairmentCognitionPsychiatryDepressive symptoms

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: People with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are with elevated risk of death. On the other hand, patients with cardiovascular risk factors are at a higher risk of death in comparison with the general population. Thus, the combination of mild cognitive impairment and hypertension/high cardio-vascular risk, may lead to even higher mortality rate than expected. However, this has not been proven. The question is important in the light of effective early screening and prophylaxis, because the real patients in our everyday practice are not with a single isolated disease or risk factor. Design and method: This is a retrospective analysis. We compared the general death rate of hypertensive high-cardio-vascular-risk patients with and without MCI. Two hundred-forty-nine patients underwent neuropsychological screening twice at least 6 months apart with MMSE and MoCA, Geriatric Depression scale and 4-point version of the scale for evaluating the performance in instrumental activities of daily living (4-IADL). The patients also had laboratory testing, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, ECG echocardiography. Their death rate was examined 8 to 10 years afterwards. Results: The patients with arterial hypertension and clinically diagnosed mild cognitive impairment (MoCA and MMSE) had significantly higher general death rate compared to those without MCI. Logistic regression analysis showed that about 14.6% of the mortality rate in this high-risk group could be attributed to MCI. The home blood pressure values were not in the target range for 63.85% at the initial neuropsychological test and for 56.43% on the reevaluation 8–10 years ago, despite the multi-drug antihypertensive regimen. The yearly all-cause mortality rate for the recent years for Bulgaria was about 14.1–15.4/1000. The relative all-cause mortality rate of this studied population was about 25.7/1000 patient on yearly basis – 1.67 times higher. Conclusions: It is known that MCI is correlated with cardiovascular risk factors and mainly - arterial hypertension. We found that the combination of MCI and arterial hypertension may lead to high mortality rate. This has important clinical implications. We will study further this issue to define in detail the factors responsible for the higher death rate in this group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HypertensionSame topicHealthcare Systems and Public HealthFrench-language works237,207