Competitive Routing on a variant of Delaunay Triangulation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of Delaunay triangulation is thought to be currently one of the best implementations in the sampling arena, whether it be technical or a non technical domain. Considering the network congestions which cause a competitive routing in any given area of the network, Delaunay triangulation has come to be proven as a good, if not the best, remedy to solve the mentioned problem. Dr. Prosenjit Bose presented a good argument back in November 2011 where he proved that connecting the nodes of any given network using the concepts of Delaunay Triangulation gave the best path between nodes, taking the least amount of time for the communication and reducing the competitive routing in the network by reducing the spanning ratio and path length by almost 5/sqrt(3). Here in this study we use the concepts of the Delaunay Triangulation to design a Java application which analyses given a set of random nodes in a plane, it connects each of them with the use of Delaunay Triangulation so that the nodes have the best path to communicate with each other.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it