Glacial Isostatic Adjustment Modelling of the Coast Mountains of British Columbia and Southeastern Alaska
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Coast Mountains in British Columbia and southeastern Alaska contain around 9040 km2 of glaciers and ice fields at present. While these glaciers have followed an overall trend of mass loss since the Little Ice Age (or LIA around 300 years before present), the past decade has seen a significant increase in melting rate that is likely to continue due to the effects of climate change. The region is home to a complex tectonic setting, having proximity to the Queen Charlotte-Fairweather transform plate boundary in the northern region and the Cascadia subduction zone (CSZ) in the southern region, which has an associated active volcanic arc underlying the glaciated area. Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) glacier melt data collected between 2000 and 2019 represent a melt rate that is averaged between periods of relatively low mass loss (2000-2009) and high mass loss (2010-2019). As a preliminary test, this average melt rate was assumed to be constant back to the LIA. A history of gridded ice thicknesses was calculated to create an ice loading model for input to a series of forward modelling calculations to determine the crustal response. Predictions of vertical crustal motion are compared to available Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) measurements of uplift rate to constrain Earth rheology. The results using this simplified loading model favour a thin lithosphere (around 20-40 km thick) and asthenospheric viscosities on the order of 1019 Pa s. These values are significantly lower than those of rheological profiles used in extant global GIA models, but are in general agreement with previous GIA modelling of the forearc region of the CSZ. To improve the glacial history model, the Open Global Glacier Model (OGGM), driven by historic climate data and statistically downscaled climate projections, is being employed to create a more accurate loading model and refine our estimates of Earth rheology and regional crustal motion. The best-fitting models will be employed to separate GIA and tectonic components of crustal motion and to generate improved regional sea-level projections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".