Organ procurement organization and university-based respiratory care program partnership to develop student internships
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Health care providers working as organ recovery coordinators (ORC) in the United States have diverse backgrounds and many of the skills needed for the position are obtained during on-the-job training. Some students in health care programs express interest in the organ procurement field but have limited experience and knowledge regarding organ procurement practices. In response to this, a partnership was developed between an undergraduate respiratory care (RC) program and its local organ procurement organization (OPO) to develop and initiate an internship designed to educate students regarding organ procurement. APPROACH: The 160-h internship was developed with collaboration between the OPO administration and faculty from the university RC program, which closely followed the OPO's formalized per diem ORC orientation model. Student reflective journals were qualitatively analyzed to determine the shared experiences during the OPO internships. FINDINGS: One RC student participated in the internship in 2017 and three RC students participated in 2019. The student interns actively participated in organ donor management in the critical care and surgical settings with the scheduled ORCs. Student progression of emotional competence and leadership were demonstrated throughout the internship. DISCUSSION: The OPO internship benefited RC students by providing opportunities for professional development that may not be available during their typical clinical rotations and strengthened their critical care skills and emotional competence. CONCLUSION: Employment as an ORC is an emerging role for respiratory therapists. Offering educational opportunities such as internships in emerging roles promotes student development and autonomy while promoting the respiratory therapy profession.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".