MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3152869737 · doi:10.22215/etd/2020-14259

"NO OTHER MEANS THAN BY PEN”: LETTERS FROM EARLY MODERN ENGLISH NUNS IN EXILE

2020· dissertation· en· W3152869737 on OpenAlexafffund
Tanyss Sharp

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Women Writers
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGossipKinshipHumilityPoliticsExaggerationLiteratureHistorySociologyMedia studiesPolitical sciencePsychologySocial psychologyArtLawPsychoanalysisAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis explores how early modern English nuns in exile on the European continent purposefully utilized letter writing as a strategy of communication with the outside world.Cut off from their homeland and families by both geographic distance and physical enclosure, letters provided women religious with a medium to ensure their convents' survival and preserve English Catholicism.This critical analysis of nuns' letters reveals the multidimensional nature and intentional construction of their correspondence.Nuns made deliberate epistolary choices.They employed strategic language, utilized flattery and humility, as well as exaggeration and gossip to achieve their objectives.A comparison of individual epistolary experiences demonstrates that letters were vital for maintaining familial and kinship ties, financial and spiritual economies, political engagement, and the transnational diffusion of information.fragmented preservation of letters from this period, this thesis will not be constrained to one particular order.Instead, it will focus on the letters of women religious from the Benedictines, Poor Clares, Carmelites, and Augustinians.Largely excluded from this examination are the Dominicans, Bridgettines, Third-Order Franciscans and Sepulchrines due to a lack of available evidence.Discussion of the Mary Ward institute will also be omitted given that these sisters were not enclosed, as such, letter writing would have held a very different meaning and purpose.5 Nonetheless, this thesis it will examine the letters of women religious from different orders to show how letter writing served as an invaluable tool of communication.By comparing individual experiences and uses of epistolary space, we gain a greater understanding of the complex ways in which women religious utilized letters.Comparison exposes common features, including the use of letters to maintain emotional bonds, remain informed and involved in political or worldly affairs, provide spiritual services, sustain economic connections, solicit new recruits, and navigate convent disputes.We will see that although the tone and content of their familial letters differed, Winefrid Thimelby and Mary Caryll were both deeply concerned for their respective family's spiritual well-being as well as the security of their convents.Analysis also the letters preserved only provide us with one side (usually the nuns') of the conversation, adding a further challenge for those seeking to reconstruct these histories.5 For a selection of historical scholarship on Mary Ward and her institute, see Jennifer Cameron, A Dangerous Innovator: Mary Ward (1585-1645) (Strathfield: St Pauls, 2000); Peter Guilday, The English Catholic Refugees on the Continent 1558-1795 (London: Longmans, 1914), 163-214; Laurence Lux-Sterrit, "Mary Ward's English Institute: The Apostolate as Self-Affirmation," Recusant History 28, no. 2 (2006): 192-208; Laurence Lux-Sterrit, "Mary Ward's English Institute and Prescribed Female Roles in the Early Modern Church," in Gender, Catholicism and Spirituality, ed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEarly Modern Women WritersFrench-language works237,207