"NO OTHER MEANS THAN BY PEN”: LETTERS FROM EARLY MODERN ENGLISH NUNS IN EXILE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis explores how early modern English nuns in exile on the European continent purposefully utilized letter writing as a strategy of communication with the outside world.Cut off from their homeland and families by both geographic distance and physical enclosure, letters provided women religious with a medium to ensure their convents' survival and preserve English Catholicism.This critical analysis of nuns' letters reveals the multidimensional nature and intentional construction of their correspondence.Nuns made deliberate epistolary choices.They employed strategic language, utilized flattery and humility, as well as exaggeration and gossip to achieve their objectives.A comparison of individual epistolary experiences demonstrates that letters were vital for maintaining familial and kinship ties, financial and spiritual economies, political engagement, and the transnational diffusion of information.fragmented preservation of letters from this period, this thesis will not be constrained to one particular order.Instead, it will focus on the letters of women religious from the Benedictines, Poor Clares, Carmelites, and Augustinians.Largely excluded from this examination are the Dominicans, Bridgettines, Third-Order Franciscans and Sepulchrines due to a lack of available evidence.Discussion of the Mary Ward institute will also be omitted given that these sisters were not enclosed, as such, letter writing would have held a very different meaning and purpose.5 Nonetheless, this thesis it will examine the letters of women religious from different orders to show how letter writing served as an invaluable tool of communication.By comparing individual experiences and uses of epistolary space, we gain a greater understanding of the complex ways in which women religious utilized letters.Comparison exposes common features, including the use of letters to maintain emotional bonds, remain informed and involved in political or worldly affairs, provide spiritual services, sustain economic connections, solicit new recruits, and navigate convent disputes.We will see that although the tone and content of their familial letters differed, Winefrid Thimelby and Mary Caryll were both deeply concerned for their respective family's spiritual well-being as well as the security of their convents.Analysis also the letters preserved only provide us with one side (usually the nuns') of the conversation, adding a further challenge for those seeking to reconstruct these histories.5 For a selection of historical scholarship on Mary Ward and her institute, see Jennifer Cameron, A Dangerous Innovator: Mary Ward (1585-1645) (Strathfield: St Pauls, 2000); Peter Guilday, The English Catholic Refugees on the Continent 1558-1795 (London: Longmans, 1914), 163-214; Laurence Lux-Sterrit, "Mary Ward's English Institute: The Apostolate as Self-Affirmation," Recusant History 28, no. 2 (2006): 192-208; Laurence Lux-Sterrit, "Mary Ward's English Institute and Prescribed Female Roles in the Early Modern Church," in Gender, Catholicism and Spirituality, ed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".