MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3153529335

Characterization of Novel Substrates of the Tankyrase and RNF146 Destruction Complex and Mechanisms of its Regulation

2020· dissertation· W3153529335 on OpenAlexaff
Arun A. Chandrakumar

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2020
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational biologyCharacterization (materials science)BiologyNeuroscienceCell biologyNanotechnologyMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poly-ADP-ribose is a post-translational modification that was first described over 50 years ago as a polymer derived from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide or NAD. Since then, a family of 17 enzymes responsible for generating Poly-ADP-ribosylation or PARylation post translational modification has been identified and characterized. A unique member of this family of enzymes, called Poly-ADP-ribose Polymerases (PARPs), are Tankyrases. There are two mammalian Tankyrases, Tankyrase 1 and 2, whose domain organization include ankyrin repeat clusters which mediate enzyme-substrate interactions and a SAM domain which regulates oligomerization of Tankyrase into large macromolecular complexes. Tankyrases bind to proteins through a ‘RxxxxG’ peptide motif which facilities these proteins to undergo PARylation. A subset of Tankyrase substrates are recognized by an E3 ligase, RNF146, which facilities protein degradation through PARylation dependent ubiquitylation. The studies summarized in this thesis have focused on the identification of new proteins targets involved in the Tankyrase:RNF146 degradation pathway and investigates how Tankyrase PARylation is regulated through FIH dependent hydroxylation. I have identified SH3BP5 and SH3BP5L as new Tankyrase substrates that are targets of RNF146. I have shown that both substrates are guanine exchange factors for the small GTPase Rab11a. I have defined the minimal catalytic core of SH3BP5/L and shown it to be composed of a novel two α-helix GEF domain. My work has demonstrated that SH3BP5 and SH3BP5L are both required for optimal activation of Rab11a in epithelial cells during lumenogenesis and that their activities are repressed by Tankyrase-mediated PARylation. RNF146 regulates Rab11a activity by controlling Tankyrase protein abundance, marking the first time that RNF146 has been described as antagonistic towards Tankyrase function. I have demonstrated that FIH-mediated hydroxylation of Tankyrase affects the ability of substrates to bind to the ankyrin repeat clusters and inhibits autoPARylation and substrate PARylation yet does not affect protein degradation. Since PARylation dependant degradation is unaffected, it suggests that hydroxylation could affect the degradation independent functions of Tankyrase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→