Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quoique l’entrée du transept nord de la cathédrale de Lichfield ait subi la dégradation des siècles appelant des restaurations, il reste certains éléments de la sculpture originale nous permettant de situer cet ensemble naguère de haute qualité dans un contexte précis de la sculpture anglaise du treizième siècle. Cet article examine rapidement l’iconographie de l’entrée et présente un document attestant son exécution avant 1241. Une analyse stylistique démontre qu’elle ne doit rien à la sculpture gothique française mais qu’elle relève plutôt de l’entreprenante école de sculpture de l’ouest de l’Angleterre et de l’Écosse qui se développa à partir de 1184-1189 depuis la chapelle de la Vierge de l’abbaye de Glastonbury. En outre, certains détails amènent l’auteur à dater exactement cette entrée de la décennie 1231-1241. D’autres observations servent également à appuyer l’idée de Lethaby que cette entrée fut un modèle pour la sculpture de l’abbaye de Westminster après 1245.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".