MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3153561851 · doi:10.1144/sp516-2020-111

Formation temperature and ages of the True North ‘orogenic’ gold deposit in Manitoba, Canada

2021· article· en· W3153561851 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul Alexandre, Mostafa Fayek

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySericiteGeochemistryMuscoviteAnkeritePyriteAlbiteGreenschistIsochronOverprintingPyrrhotiteBiotiteEpidoteQuartzAmphiboleGeochronologyChloritePlagioclaseMetamorphic rockSideritePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The True North orogenic gold deposit is situated in the 2.99–2.70 Ga Rice Lake greenstone belt near Bissett (Manitoba, Canada). This belt is the western equivalent of northern Ontario's Abitibi gold-producing region. The lithology and alteration, structural control, geochronological framework, and ore geology of the True North orogenic gold deposit have been addressed, but its formation temperature and age are poorly constrained. The deposit's gold-bearing veins are composed mostly of quartz (40 to 80%), ankerite (20 to 30%), and albite (5 to 25%), with minor muscovite, sericite, chlorite, and calcite. Sulfide minerals are dominated by pyrite and chalcopyrite and with minor pyrrhotite; native gold appears as inclusions in sulfides or as free gold. In general, most of the major minerals, the sulfides, and gold all precipitated during the main ore stage. The oxygen isotopic composition of co-existing quartz–albite and quartz–ankerite couples were used to calculate a formation temperature of approximately 230°C for these minerals, which is comparable to the nearby 007 gold deposit. These temperatures are on the low end of the temperature range reported for orogenic gold deposits. 40 Ar/ 39 Ar geochronology (single grain laser fusion of muscovite and sericite) revealed the presence of two age groups, at 2441.2 ± 8.8 Ma and 2483.1 ± 10.2 Ma, approximately 200 myr lower than the age of the main collision-related deformation within the Rice Lake belt. These ages indicate that the True North deposit was clearly post-orogenic, similar to vein gold deposits elsewhere, and was likely produced by the emplacement of the Huronian Supergroup and the thermal effects of the Matachewan large igneous province, which has the same ages. It is suggested that the True North deposit may belong to a descriptive category of post-orogenic low-temperature quartz–carbonate–albite vein gold deposit, more in line with recent developments in classification schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207