MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3153602584 · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/abf69e

Power density improvement based on investigation of initial relative position in an electromagnetic energy harvester with self-powered applications

2021· article· en· W3153602584 on OpenAlex
Yan Peng, Dong Zhang, Jun Luo, Shaorong Xie, Huayan Pu, Zhongjie Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSmart Materials and Structures · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPower densityElectromagnetic coilPower (physics)PhysicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceNuclear magnetic resonanceThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we originally report a breakthrough in the power density of a novel electromagnetic energy harvester to scavenge ambient low-frequency vibration energy. The harvester adopted a configuration of alternating south- and north-pole magnet array, which causes a step-change in magnetic flux density, contributing to high electromotive force output. Through analysis of the coil configuration and the initial relative position between coils and magnets, the harvester can take full advantage of the abrupt flux density change, which enhances its output power significantly. Experimental results adequately validated the simulation analysis regarding the correlation between the initial relative position and output power, and exhibited a high output performance. Namely, the maximum average power and power density the harvester yields are 44.8 mW and 1.6 <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>mW</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>c</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , respectively, with the optimum resistance of 30 Ω at resonance under the excitation of 1 g. It took the harvester around 5 min to charge a button lithium battery up to 21%. Meanwhile, a LED array composed of 180 diodes was successfully lighted up, and a calculator was powered for around 630 s within a 20 s of charging period. This research shows great potential in the development of self-powered systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it